Abstract
Introduction. Mutations in genes of factors II (G20210A) and V (G1691A) are well known determinants of hereditary thrombo- philia, but their presence, especially in the heterozygous form, does not always lead to the development of thrombotic com- plications. This indicates the importance of objective methods for the detection of prothrombotic phenotype in carriers of these mutations. Thrombin generation test (TGT) demonstrates the state of individual’s hemostasis in the interaction of pro- coagulant and anticoagulant mechanisms and allows to detect the hypercoagulability.
Aim: to assess the hemostatic potential in asymptomatic carriers of FV G1691A or/and FII G20210A mutations by TGT.
Materials and methods. We examined 42 asymptomatic carriers of FV G1691A mutation and/or G20210A prothrombin gene mutation (14 men and 28 women, average age — 37,0 ± 15,0 years). TGT was performed in platelet-poor plasma. In thrombino- gram we assessed following parameters: PT (Peak thrombin is the maximum amount of thrombin formed in the sample), ETP (endogenous thrombin potential), Lag-time (coagulation initiation time) and V (thrombin generation rate).
Results. According to data obtained, heterozygous carriage of FV G1691A and/or FII G20210A mutations can be associated with both prothrombotic and normal phenotypes. In asymptomatic carriers of Leiden mutation we revealed elevated values of ETP and RT in 44% of cases, while resistance to activated protein C — in 67%. The majority of FII G20210A mutation carriers demonstrated increased values of ETP and PT (71% and 57%, respectively). Thrombin generation rate exceeded normal values in 57% and 64% carriers of FV G1691A and FII G20210A mutations, respectively. The majority of examined patients can be characterized as having intermediate prothrombotic phenotype, taking into account that they had both normal and pathological values of TGT parameters.
Conclusion. TGT is a perspective method for creating an individual risk profile in asymptomatic carriers of mutations associated with hereditary thrombophilia.
REFERENCES
1. Subbotovskaya A. I., Shilova A. N., Karmadonova N. et. Frequen- cy of hemostatic gene polymorphisms in patients with pulmonary embolism. [Chastota vstrechaemosti polimorfizmov genov sistemi gemostaza u bol’nih s tromboembolilei legochnoi arterii]. Trom- boz, gemostaz i reologiya. 2013; 3: 70–5 (in Russ.).
2. Vossen C. Y., Conard J., Fontcuberta J. et al. Risk of a first venous thrombotic event in carriers of a familial thrombophilic defect. The European prospective cohort on trombophilia (EPCOT). J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3: 459–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538–7836.2005.01197. x.
3. Putilova N. V. Screening diagnostics of hemostasis pathology asso- ciated with thrombophilia in obstetric patients. [Skriningovaia diagnostika patologii gemostaza, associirovannoi s trombofiliei, u pacientok akusherskogo profilia]. Tromboz, gemostaz i reologi- ya. 2014; 2: 53–6 (in Russ.).
4. Segers O., Oerle R., Cate H. et al. Thrombin generation as an inter- mediate phenotype for venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 1: 114–122. DOI: 10.1160/TH09–06–0356.
5. Tripodi A. Detection of procoagulant imbalance. Modified endog- enous thrombin potential with results expressed as ratio of val- ues with-to-without thrombomodulin. Thromb Haemost. 2017; 5: 830–6. DOI: 10.1160/TH16–10–0806.
6. Namestnikov Yu. A., Golovina O. G., Papayan L. P. Importance of thrombin generation test in clinical practice. [Znachenie testa generacii trombina v klinicheskoi practice]. Tromboz, gemostaz i reologiya. 2011; 4: 47–9 (in Russ.).
7. Hemker H. C., Giesen P., Dieri R. et al. Calibrated automated thrombin generation measurement in clotting plasma. Pathophysi- ol Haemost Thromb. 2003; 33 (1): 4–15.
8. Dargaud Y., Trzeciak M., Borget J. et al. Use of calibrated automat- ed thrombography thrombomodulin to recognize the prothrom- botic phenotype. Thromb Haemost. 2006; 96: 562–7.
9. Dielis A. W., Castodoli E. R., Spronk H. M. et al. Coagulation fac- tors and the protein C system as determinants of thrombin gen- eration in a normal population. J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 6: 125– 31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538–7836.2007.02824. x.
10. Rehak M., Rehak J., Muller M. et al. The prevalence of activated pro- tein C (APC) resistance and factor V Leiden is significantly higher in patients with retinal vein occlusion without general risk factors. Thromb Haemost. 2008; 99: 925–9. DOI:10.1160/TH07–11–0658.
11. Shmeleva V., Matvienko O., Polyakova A. et al. Resistance to acti- vated protein C detected in the test of thrombin generation, as the most common prothrombotic factor in patients with early debut of venous thrombosis. [Rezistentnost` k aktivirovannomu proteinu C, vijavlyaemaja v teste generacii trombina, kak naibolee raspros- tranennij protromboticheskij factor y bol`nix s rannim debyutom venoznogo tromboza]. VI Vserossijskaja konferencija po kliniches- koj gemostaziologii i gemoreologii v serdechno-sosudistoi hirur- gii: tezisy dokl. Moskva. 2015: 464–5 (in Russ.).
12. Poort S. R., Rosendaal F. R., Reitsma P. H. et al. A common genetic variation in the 3’-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood. 1996; 15: 3698–703.
13. MacCallum P., Bowles L., Keeling D. Diagnosis and management of heritable thrombophilias. BMJ. 2014; 17: 349–58.
14. Rodeghiero F., Tosetto A. Activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden mutation are independent risk factors for venous throm- boembolism. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 643–50.
15. Shmeleva V., Smirnova O., Karpich et al. Evaluation of endoge- nous hemostatic potential and resistance to activated protein C in carriers of mutations of factor V Leiden and/or prothrombin gene G20210A with the help of the thrombin generation test. [Ocen- ka endogennogo gemostaticheskogo potenciala i rezistentnosti k aktivirovannomu proteinu C u nositelej mutacii factora V Leiden i/ili F20210A gena protrombina s pomochjy testa generacii trom- bina]. II Rossijskij congress laboratornoj medicini: tezisy dokl. Moskva. 2016: 61 (in Russ.).
