Hemostasis changes in pregnant women with fetal growth retardation: 618.333
Тромбоз, гемостаз и реология

Tromboz, Gemostaz I Reologiya
scientific and practical journal

ISSN 2078–1008 (Print); ISSN 2687-1483 (online)

Keywords

pregnancy
fetal growth retardation
placental insufficiency
hemostasis
prothrombotic condition

Abstract

Summary. Background: Fetal growth retardation (FGR) is the second leading cause of perinatal mortality, has a long-term adverse effect on child health. Assessment of hemostasis activation in FGR in comparison with clinical outcomes is important for understanding pathogenesis, improving the prognosis and prevention of this pathological state. Objectives: to assess hemostasis state in pregnant women with FGR compared to women with physiological pregnancy. Patients/Methods: Type of study: crosssectional based on cohort. The study included 52 pregnant women. The main group consisted of 32 patients with FGR diagnosed by ultrasound fetometry; the control group consisted of 20 practically healthy women without burdened obstetric-gynecological history, with physiological pregnancy that ended in uncomplicated childbirth. Hemostasis assessment was carried out at 24–32 weeks of gestation. Results: Smoking during pregnancy as a factor of thrombotic risk was more common in pregnant women with FGR. FGR was significantly associated with oligohydramnios, genital and intrauterine infection, preeclampsia, and placental insufficiency. Women with FGR showed a higher level of fibrinogen, as well as an increased rate of clot growth, clot larger size, and more frequent formation of spontaneous clots in comparison with the control group. Conclusions: Pregnant women with FGR are characterized by prothrombotic state that may be the basis for further development of antithrombotic correction for improving perinatal outcomes.

References
  1. Sharma D., Shastri S., Farahbakhsh N., Sharma P. Intrauterine growth restriction — part 1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(24):3977–87. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1152249.
  2. Ganichkina M.B., Mantrova D.A., Kan N.E. et al. Pregnancy management with fetal growth retardation. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2017;(10):5–11. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18565/aig.2017.10.5–11.
  3. Priante E., Verlato G., Giordano G. et al. Intrauterine growth restriction: new insight from the metabolomic approach. Metabolites. 2019;9(11). pii: E267. DOI: 10.3390/metabo9110267.
  4. Chatelain P. Children born with intra‐uterine growth retardation (IUGR) or small for gestational age (SGA): long term growth and metabolic consequences. Endocr Regul. 2000;34(1):33–6.
  5. Leite D.F.B., Cecatti J.G. Fetal growth restriction prediction: how to move beyond. Scientific World Journal. 2019;2019:1519048. DOI: 10.1155/2019/1519048.
  6. Hales C.N., Barker D.J. The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Br Med Bull. 2001;60:5–20. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/60.1.5.
  7. Chassen S., Jansson T. Complex, coordinated and highly regulated changes in placental signaling and nutrient transport capacity in IUGR. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(2):165373. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.12.024.
  8. Momot A.P., Nikolaeva M.G., Serdyuk G.V. et al. Assessment of hemostasis in physiological pregnancy. Algorithms of examination in high risk groups. Tromboz, gemostaz i reologiya. 2019;(4):80–130. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25555/THR.2019.4.0903.
  9. Savelyeva G.M., Sukhikh G.T., Serov V.N., Radzinsky V.E. National leadership. Obstetrics. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. 1088 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Clinical protocols. Doppler study during pregnancy. Moscow: FGBU «NMIC AGiP im. akad. V.I. Kulakova» MZ RF, 2015. 8–14. (In Russ.). Available at: http://www.kb51.ru/pdf/p7.pdf.
  11. Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Preeclampsia Eclampsia. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocol). Moscow, 2016. 40 p. (In Russ.). Available at: http://www.rokb.ru/sites/default/files/pictures/gipertenzivnye_rasstroystva_vo_vremya_beremennosti_v_rodah_i_poslerodovom_periode._preeklampsiya._eklampsiya.pdf.
  12. 2013 GROWTH CHART. Available at: https://www.ucalgary.ca/ fenton. [Accessed: 20.01.2020].
  13. Lieberman E., Gremy I., Lang J.M.,Cohen A.P. Low birth weight at term and the timing of fetal exposure to maternal smoking. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1127–31. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1127.
  14. Goryunova A.G., Simonova M.S., Murashko A.V. Fetal growth retardation syndrome and adaptation of the placenta. Arhiv akusherstva i ginekologii im. V.F. Snegireva. 2016;3(2):76–80. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18821/2313–8726–2016–3–2–76–80.
  15. Wallfisch A., Hallak M. Hypertension. In: High risk pregnancy management options. Eds. D.K. James, P.J. Steer, Weiner C.P., B. Gonik. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2006. 772–97.
  16. Figueras F., Gardosi J. Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):288–300. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.055.
  17. Voroshilina E.S., Ovsepyan R.A., Plotko E.E. et al. The ranges of thrombodynamic assay parameters during physiological pregnancy. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2016;16(1):11–6. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/rosakush201616110–16.
  18. Ataullakhanov F.I., Balandina A.N., Vardanyan D.M. The use of the thrombodynamics test to assess the state of the hemostatic system: Educational and methodological recommendations. Ed. Dr., Prof. A.M. Shulutko. Moscow, 2015. 72 p. (In Russ.).
  19. Zvezdina Yu.M., Vorobyeva N.A. Values of thrombodynamics test and D‐dimer level in pregnant women with aggravated obstetric history. Medicinskij alfavit. 2017;1(6):38–41. (In Russ.).
  20. Kuznik B.I., Zagorodnyaya E.D., Iozefson S.A., Isakova N.V. Thrombodynamic method of evaluation of some hemostatic parameters in healthy pregnant women and in women with preeclampsia. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskih boleznej. 2018;67(6):38–44. DOI: (In Russ.). 10.17816/JOWD67638–44.
  21. KhongT.Y., MooneyE.E., Ariel I. et al. Sampling and definitions of placental lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(7):698–713. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015–0225‐CC.
  22. Sato Y., Benirschke K., Marutsuka K. et al. Associations of intrauterine growth restriction with placental pathological factors, maternal factors and fetal factors; clinicopathological findings of 257 Japanese cases. Histol Histopathol. 2013;28(1):127–32. DOI: 10.14670/HH‐28.127.
  23. Spinillo A., Gardella B., Adamo L. et al. Pathologic placental lesions in early and late fetal growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(12):1585–94. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13699.